- Jun 29, 2006
goboilers said:Originally Posted by Boltjolt
Placed some bets today
Michigan -13.5 @ HOME vs Wisconsin
Louisville -13.5 @ Kansas st
Texas - 24.5 @ home vs Iowa st --- Iowa St. isnt that bad of a team :no:
Falcons -3.5 vs Saints --- Homer in me says no. Gambler in me says that Saints play ATL tough no matter what and ATL has been winning despite of Vick rather than bec. of him. Vick looks horrible.
Jacksonville +7 vs Colts
On a teaser i have:
Minnesota +3 @ Purdue -- Bad Bet. Yes, its a bit of homer in me but that bet makes no sense. Purdue isnt going to lose to Minny. They have nothing. No Maroney...
Ohio st @ home vs Penn st -11 --- R u sure its only -11?? bec. Penn could trust me put up some pts and play D. They are a very talented team and it is the big 10.
Alabama Birmingham -4 @ home vs Miss st
I love the homer in me :icon_rofl: :icon_rofl: :icon_party: :icon_rofl: :icon_rofl:Boltjolt said:The homer in you is indeed a funny thing to read on these forums i have to admit :lol:
Now lets face some facts here:
The Saints are not that good a team and have won two games against bad teams. Atlanta is not a bad team and should win this game easily.....even with the hype surrounding the dome reopening. Yeah, Vick the passer doesnt scare anybody but he has a better rating than Brees does :icon_eek:
And is averaging 87 yards rushing a game so far.
You could say that the Chargers have played two bad teams as well and you would be right, but the difference is that the Chargers didnt struggle against those bad teams while the Saints did.
As for Minnesota.......they have a good offense and so does Purdue but Purdue beat crappy teams.
You say Minnesota has nothing, but i see a better team with a better defense. Purdue's defense is ranked 104 out of the 119 division 1 teams while Minnesota is 58. Purdue's defense on average thru 3 games gives up 30+ points a game to cream puffs.
BJ, maybe I am not the homer but u r the hater :yes: :icon_mrgreen: